Governments Need to Disrupt the Business of War Crimes
Anton Moiseienko and Matthew Neuhaus, writing in Just Security:
International crimes are typically complex and coordinated, involving multiple perpetrators. For instance, crimes against humanity by definition entail a “widespread or systematic” attack against civilian population. This means they need to be funded and resourced, creating a financial footprint.They can also generate profit, sometimes in a manner that fuses commercial and political motivations. A series of “industrialist” trials at Nuremberg concerned the activities of major German industrial conglomerates embedded within the Nazi war machine. In its judgment against officials of IG Farben, the chemical company that had supplied poison gas to concentration camps, the Tribunal wrote that “Farben marched with the Wehrmacht and played a major role in Germany’s program for acquisition by conquest.”
Today’s equivalents of IG Farben also march with invading armies; fund atrocities; sell off lands and properties acquired by conquest; and profit off contracts to “rebuild” razed cities. Russia’s war against Ukraine offers a stark illustration, as we detail in a recent report.
They are very right to reference Russia’s actions in Ukraine, but it is surprising in this context not to note Gaza or Sudan as other places where this approach is relevant.